rich1.0npub1wkvp6vlwa78nyh2k0cvaz6kej2xkt3axe6fdyxg5a5xu73sduagsf3nkfahttps://nostr.ae/npub1wkvp6vlwa78nyh2k0cvaz6kej2xkt3axe6fdyxg5a5xu73sduagsf3nkfanjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18 📝 Original message:And this is how the powers that be compromise bitcoin. They can't stop TCP/IP, but they sure can take over the development team. It's a good thing that no one from the CIA has had any conversations with anyone from the bitcoin development team. Phew... On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.: > > I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you > > are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be > > active in development again? > > Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. I > think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the > impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the > moment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly > whether it was Satoshi or not. > > Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute > priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork > should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the > cows come home. > > But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which > site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end. > That's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites. > > - oliver > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150818/c2b56f99/attachment-0001.html>