<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpx</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2018-05-09&#xA;📝 Original message:Olaoluwa Osuntokun &lt;laolu32 at gmail.com&gt; writes:&#xA;&gt; What are the downsides of just using p2wsh? This route can be rolled out&#xA;&gt; immediately, while policy changes are pretty &#34;fuzzy&#34; and would require a&#xA;&gt; near uniform rollout in order to ensure wide propagation of the commitment&#xA;&gt; transactions.&#xA;&#xA;I expect we will, but thougth I&#39;d ask :)&#xA;&#xA;I get annoyed when people say &#34;We found this issue, but we worked around&#xA;it and so never bothered you with it!&#34; for my projects :)&#xA;&#xA;Cheers,&#xA;Rusty.</html></oembed>