<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1ac86vemj7ce5z8jyxt39rna3tvwql6xd30ha3vxcd6esysp23d9qrlswfj</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1ac86vemj7ce5z8jyxt39rna3tvwql6xd30ha3vxcd6esysp23d9qrlswfj</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-03-21&#xA;📝 Original message:According to Bernstein it&#39;s patent FUD (expired, ancient and solid prior&#xA;art).&#xA;&#xA;http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-August/005126.html&#xA;&#xA;Adam&#xA;&#xA;On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:33:57PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:&#xA;&gt;   Oh, one other reason I found - apparently RIM, at least in the past,&#xA;&gt;   has been telling CA&#39;s that they need to pay mad bux for the Certicom&#xA;&gt;   ECC patents. So that&#39;s another reason why most certs are still using&#xA;&gt;   RSA.</html></oembed>