<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0n</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-10-01&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sunday 01 October 2017 8:39:11 PM Mark Friedenbach wrote:&#xA;&gt; What about an optional commitment to witness size in bytes? The value zero&#xA;&gt; meaning “I don’t care.” I would argue that it should be a maximum however,&#xA;&gt; and therefor serialized as part of the witness. The serialization of this&#xA;&gt; would be very compact (1 plus the difference between actual and maximum,&#xA;&gt; with zero meaning not used.)&#xA;&#xA;Could just do SIGHASH_WITNESS_SIZE in addition to SIGHASH_WITNESS_DEPTH...</html></oembed>