<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>vinney...axkl (npub19m…8axkl)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub19ma2w9dmk3kat0nt0k5dwuqzvmg3va9ezwup0zkakhpwv0vcwvcsg8axkl</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Why do all the recent excellent p2p products seem to have an allergy to servers? I have multiple devices, one of which may be an always-on &#34;server&#34;. This is a valid peer, and a much more useful one than other categories of edge device which are often offline or have bandwidth and battery constraints. &#xA;Once we agree that an always-on, hardwired device is obviously useful, and that individuals should own these wonderful personal servers, we can start to use these terrifically useful things to personally serve our own edge clients.&#xA;&#xA;And since we now all have always-on personal servers, why not just peer those together instead of our edge devices (which we already saw are flaky).... What a better pattern!  &#xA;&#xA;A network of peer to peer rock-solid personal servers, providing private client experiences to our silly edge devices.&#xA;&#xA;Sometimes the peer to peer crowd gets a little too high on its own supply wrt what a &#34;peer&#34; is... </html></oembed>