rich1.0npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-07-22 📝 Original message:Addendum: Please do not interpret - as many have - my points as advocating against letting a fee market ever develop(!). Fees are useful against DoS, increasing cost of attack etc. Further, continuing the artificially-low fee policy ad infinitum is unsustainable and constitutes a moral hazard. Examine from the user's point of view. If you want to develop a fee market, think it through in the context of user expectation/experience - which translates to how software is written and users behave, the context of market disruption, and the context of further block size increases. Transition to a new economic policy should be planned. It should give users and markets time to adjust. It is grossly irresponsible to simply drop users into a new economic policy with no warning and no preparation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/a2a73eea/attachment.html>