<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA512&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak &lt;btcdrak at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev&#xA;&gt;&lt;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat&#xA;&gt;models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the&#xA;&gt;blocksize.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;That&#39;s exactly what the &#34;Technical Opinion&#34; column is for.&#xA;&#xA;What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;&#xA;iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG&#xA;AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH&#xA;Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD&#xA;seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl&#xA;CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6&#xA;JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ&#xA;za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=&#xA;=Jfl+&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</html></oembed>