rich1.0jackspirko (npub158…5kv0n)https://nostr.ae/npub15879mltlln6k8jy32k6xvagmtqx3zhsndchcey8gjyectwldk88sq5kv0nnjumphttps://nostr.aeWhy BIP-110 Will Fail in a Nutshell All miners are also node runners. You can't mine with out nodes. All exchanges also run nodes as do software wallet companies. These are active monetary nodes with real transactions on them. Sadly plebs have been convinced plugging in a box, installing a few apps and staring at it equals "securing the bitcoin network", which it kind of does. Adding to BTC security is easy, it was designed to be so. Changing BTC is hard, it was desinged to be so. It was then an easy push to convince these plebs that one node one vote was a thing. Satoshi said "one cpu, one vote", and he meant not just a node but mining and using bitcoin. The entire thing is sad because many of us are open to addressing the spam issue but we can't be forced into it by people with zero understanding of how BTC works. I can see the book a few years from now, "High Jacking Bitcoin 2.0" by Luke Dashjr Subtitle - "How Pedos and Suitcioners Killed the Real Bitcoin" And no one will care. Again. And if spam clogging network and driving up fees which slows adoption is real, then were are the high fees? The entire revolt seems to be a house or cards full of conspiracy theorists, well meaning dupes and a significant number of incels. None of whom have bothered to learn anything about how BTC actually works. https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html