<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 01:25:14PM -0400, Michael Naber wrote:&#xA;&gt; Global network consensus means that there is global network recognition&#xA;&gt; that a particular transaction has occurred and is irreversible. The&#xA;&gt; off-chain solutions you describe, while probably useful for other purposes,&#xA;&gt; do not exhibit this characteristic and so they are not global network&#xA;&gt; consensus networks.&#xA;&#xA;Hub-and-spoke payment channels and the Lightning network are not&#xA;off-chain solutions, they are ways to more efficiently use on-chain&#xA;transactions to achive the goal of moving assets from point a to point&#xA;b, resulting in more economic transactions being done with fewer - but&#xA;not zero! - blockchain transactions.&#xA;&#xA;Off-chain transaction systems such as Changetip allow economic&#xA;transactions to happen with no blockchain transactions at all.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin Core scales as O(N), where N is the number of transactions. Can we&#xA;&gt; do better than this while still achieving global consensus?&#xA;&#xA;No, Bitcoin the network scales with O(n^2) with your above criteria, as&#xA;each node creates k transactions, thus each node has to verify k*n&#xA;transactions, resulting in O(n^2) total work.&#xA;&#xA;For Bitcoin to have O(n) scaling you have to assume that the number of&#xA;validation nodes doesn&#39;t scale with the number of users, thus resulting&#xA;in a system where users trust others to do validation for them. That is&#xA;not a global consensus system; that&#39;s a trust-based system.&#xA;&#xA;There&#39;s nothing inherently wrong with that, but why change Bitcoin&#xA;itself into a trust-based system, when you can preserve the global&#xA;consensus functionality, and built a trust-based system on top of it?&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;&#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;0000000000000000007fc13ce02072d9cb2a6d51fae41fefcde7b3b283803d24&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 650 bytes&#xA;Desc: Digital signature&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/7e726f75/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>