<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-07-18&#xA;📝 Original message:Hi all,&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;ve sent a pull request to make a small change to BIP 62 (my&#xA;anti-malleability proposal) which is still a draft; see:&#xA;* https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/90 (the request)&#xA;* https://github.com/sipa/bips/blob/bip62up/bip-0062.mediawiki (the result)&#xA;&#xA;It makes two of the 7 new rules mandatory in new blocks, even for&#xA;old-style transactions. Both are already non-standard since 0.8.0, and&#xA;have no use cases in my opinion.&#xA;&#xA;The reason for this change is dropping the requirement for signature&#xA;verification engines to be bug-for-bug compatible with OpenSSL (which&#xA;supports many non-standard encodings for signatures). Requiring strict&#xA;DER compliance for signatures means any implementation just needs to&#xA;support DER.&#xA;&#xA;Comments?&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Pieter</html></oembed>