<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95j</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95j</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:&#xA;&gt; &#34;static address&#34; seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended&#xA;&gt; use/direction.&#xA;&#xA;...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?&#xA;&#xA;More seriously, I don&#39;t think a typical user will understand anything from&#xA;the phrase &#34;static address&#34;.  But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter&#xA;than &#34;address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated&#34;. :-)&#xA;&#xA;-roy</html></oembed>