<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2011-12-19&#xA;🗒️ Summary of this message: Stick to simple standards like HTTP instead of using JSON which has poor language support and cannot represent binary data effectively.&#xA;📝 Original message:On Monday, December 19, 2011 2:56:09 AM Jorge Timón wrote:&#xA;&gt; For the &#34;answer format&#34; JSON seems ok,&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;d prefer we stick to simple standards.&#xA;HTTP alone should really be fine to build on...&#xA;&#xA;JSON in particular has very poor language support, and cannot reasonably &#xA;represent binary data (such as a custom output script). The HTTP &#xA;specification, however, allows binary data in multipart content just fine.</html></oembed>