<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub16lyqvgruy8k0mmn9f3gqr69w0xlahmzlc6x6lq95amk6uppffm3q69pqjm</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub16lyqvgruy8k0mmn9f3gqr69w0xlahmzlc6x6lq95amk6uppffm3q69pqjm</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt; Issues that would need to be resolved:&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; 1) Who pays for it? Most obvious answer: Foundation. However there&#39;s&#xA;&gt; currently a fairly clear line between the foundation website and the&#xA;&gt; bitcoin.org &lt;http://bitcoin.org&gt; website. I personally am fine with the&#xA;&gt; bitcoin foundation funding the website, it&#39;s a lot closer to the bitcoin&#xA;&gt; community than github. But some people might care. So next step would be&#xA;&gt; to contact the Foundation board and see if they&#39;re willing to fund it.&#xA;&#xA;Actually I might find way to fund it. But I needed to have ACK &amp;&#xA;comments from developers before anything.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; 2) Anti-DoS? I assume github handles this at the moment, though I doubt&#xA;&gt; there&#39;s anything to be gained from DoSing the informational website&#xA;&#xA;That is a fair question, we will need anti-DDoS. Unless something better&#xA;(and affordable) can be recommended, this would yet put another Bitcoin&#xA;website under CloudFlare.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; 4) Who admins it?&#xA;&#xA;Obviously, I thought it would be important that the server is owned by&#xA;someone who can be trusted, with ssh access for all core developers.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; 5) Who controls DNS for it?&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m not sure we&#39;ll get any change on this level. I have no idea if the&#xA;domain is in good hands, except for the fact that nothing bad happened&#xA;thus far. If anything, moving it to core developers (as intended when&#xA;the domain was registered) would make more sense IMO. But again, is it&#xA;possible, I don&#39;t know.</html></oembed>