rich1.0npub1swfeusu3ua9trup00qcnrgc2yndksyvgku4epk5tec7u4fmrez6qxpul5thttps://nostr.ae/npub1swfeusu3ua9trup00qcnrgc2yndksyvgku4epk5tec7u4fmrez6qxpul5tnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12 📝 Original message:> To remain useful as border router, the replace-by-fee patched core should > only relay double spend if it actually replaces an earlier transaction, as > otherwise the replace logic that is according to your commit more than just > fee comparison, would have to be replicated in the proprietary stack and > mempool might get out of sync with that of the border router. > Why don't you use getrawmempool RPC call to synchronize mempool contents? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/d898c0e1/attachment.html>