rich1.0npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-05-07 📝 Original message:On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote: > > That's why I conclude the opposite - if there is no fork, then people's > confidence in Bitcoin will be seriously damaged. > Yes, that is a possibility. > If it's impossible to do something as trivial as removing a temporary hack > Satoshi put in place, then what about bigger challenges? > This is absolutely not a trivial change. It is a trivial *code* change. It is not a trivial change to the economics of a $3.2B system. -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150507/9ef5c02d/attachment.html>