<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub168j7xscxgv5tup3uxm0tpkktvc9ctzwuhj5szyhec3y4qwmrawaq9hhm7q</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub168j7xscxgv5tup3uxm0tpkktvc9ctzwuhj5szyhec3y4qwmrawaq9hhm7q</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-07-23&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt; Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 7:28 PM&#xA;&gt; From: &#34;Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev&#34; &lt;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt;&#xA;&gt; To: &#34;Tom Harding&#34; &lt;tomh at thinlink.com&gt;&#xA;&gt; Cc: bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&#xA;&gt; Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; I&#39;m frankly tired of all the negativity here&#xA;&#xA;You complained about the lack of quantitative analysis being used, I gave it to you. There&#39;s nothing &#34;negative&#34; about displaying data which doesn&#39;t completely back up what your position is, I made a sensible conclusion based on the facts I have in front of me. Ignoring the information I collected and presented for you is incredibly childish. &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I&#39;d really like to move from &#34;IMPOSSIBLE because...  (electrum hasn&#39;t been optimized&#xA;&gt; (by the way: you should run on SSDs, LevelDB isn&#39;t designed for spinning disks),&#xA;&#xA;I should stress that I didn&#39;t present that timing information as a dig against their software, it just happens to be something I have direct access to and can prevent clean data about. The point that I was attempting to make is that Bitcoin Core isn&#39;t the only piece of software in the ecosystem with performance problems, given that a large portion of users have Electrum wallets it would be insane not to consider the impact changes will have on the people that charitably run servers for the community. &#xA;&#xA;By the way, is that an offer to buy my dedicated server some new SSDs? &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&gt; work with people like Tom and Mike who have a &#39;lets get it done&#39; attitude, and&#xA;&gt; focus on what it will take to scale up.&#xA;&#xA;Scaling up isn&#39;t tweaking parameters and ignoring the brickwork falling around your head. You mention that you think the merkle tree can hold an unlimited amount of information, that&#39;s all very well so long as people can actually validate the thing. Miners aren&#39;t even willing to validate their own blocks at the peril of losing $7000 USD (on two occasions now), so why would anybody else?</html></oembed>