<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1r375vdaydp5nnnytff6ee2kwzxak8whmwkmnkm6h67agr7dadfkqxn6ccq</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1r375vdaydp5nnnytff6ee2kwzxak8whmwkmnkm6h67agr7dadfkqxn6ccq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-12-17&#xA;📝 Original message:&#xA;What&#39;s the rational for using millisatoshis as the units for lightning &#xA;channels? Aren&#39;t you going to loose up to 1/2 of a satoshi when the &#xA;channel is closed? Is this because it doesn&#39;t hurt and you might as well &#xA;be open to the opportunity for these sub satoshi transactions, because &#xA;if you aren&#39;t, you are giving up the opportunity to get accumulated &#xA;revenue from many of those small transactions, that could end up being &#xA;greater than 1/2 of a satoshi?&#xA;&#xA;Since millisatoshis is used, is there a maximum channel funding size?&#xA;&#xA;Is the optional initial push of millisatoshis during the channel &#xA;creation there in order to motivate the other party to be willing to &#xA;waste their time with the channel creation in the first place? If not, &#xA;what&#39;s it for?&#xA;&#xA;In all of the clients that I&#39;ve looked at, I can&#39;t seem to find out how &#xA;to define the timeout closing out a channel when someone does not &#xA;cooperate. Is there a fixed value for this as part of the protocol? Or &#xA;do most clients have a default that they enforce over all channels that &#xA;they create?&#xA;&#xA;Thanks,&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Andy Schroder</html></oembed>