<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05&#xA;📝 Original message:On Oct 5, 2015 2:08 PM, &#34;Clément Elbaz&#34; &lt;clem.ds at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; It will get correct results about :&#xA;&gt; - the existence every block&#xA;&gt; - the existence of every transaction&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; It will get incorrect results :&#xA;&gt; - about the nature of some transactions&#xA;&#xA;Given the assumptions above, only of transactions without enough&#xA;confirmations.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; - and therefore, about the balances of some wallets.&#xA;&#xA;Not if the wallet waits for enough confirmations.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/51a36627/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>