<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&#xA;&gt; Alan argues that 7 tps is a couple orders of magnitude too low&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;By the way, just to clear this up - the real limit at the moment is more&#xA;like 3 tps, not 7.&#xA;&#xA;The 7 transactions/second figure comes from calculations I did years ago,&#xA;in 2011. I did them a few months before the &#34;sendmany&#34; command was&#xA;released, so back then almost all transactions were small. After sendmany&#xA;and as people developed custom wallets, etc, the average transaction size&#xA;went up.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150508/4c054cee/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>