<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub15wz8j5cse6sexlw6f5q7arc5efe5hxn6kcxxyy222et8qms4u3lsemaru8</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub15wz8j5cse6sexlw6f5q7arc5efe5hxn6kcxxyy222et8qms4u3lsemaru8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03&#xA;📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----&#xA;Hash: SHA1&#xA;&#xA;I suggest revising these items for clarity (and I&#39;m guessing on the first&#xA;one)&#xA;&#xA;    Calculate hardLimit by examining the coinbase scriptSig votes of the&#xA;previous 12,000 blocks, and taking the 20th percentile.&#xA;    A new hardLimit may not increase or decrease by more than 1.2x beyond&#xA;the prior hardLimit.&#xA;&#xA;to:&#xA;&#xA;    The new hardLimit is calculated by sorting the coinbase scriptSig votes&#xA;of the last 12,000 blocks from lowest to highest and using the vote of the&#xA;2400th block.&#xA;    If the vote of the 2400th block is a change of less than 20%, use it as&#xA;the new hardLimit.  Otherwise, change the hardLimit to be closer to that&#xA;vote, to either 120% or 80% of the current hardLimit.&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t understand #5, 75% rule.  Shouldn&#39;t invalid version 4 blocks always&#xA;be rejected?&#xA;&#xA;notplato&#xA;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;Version: GnuPG v2&#xA;&#xA;iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV58/5AAoJEL8dSijmIbHt16IH/0jAr3v1HjWW7N1awNxeAABs&#xA;GIvOFYuZAcPkZvWZQc4JRAppglqeBfYqWl2gpyywSBK1SXjsY8zdo3t7xAK/IJfB&#xA;05hnv1GGutG3dLTzJBEXaPx62SLukepC1pzEH7rlwWvVuE9zcRqVE1eGbBEUjA9c&#xA;sGPr0z9BNeLoTbllyl3Jndz9N2Vnd6bBTxRgBlfkm/Y5ovc+GhyKZyX3Pdmj5Pga&#xA;E6foOsvqNXQJqPl8WCODsnfPSshyb7YRNFrBB9A+tpjvj4UMc8PxOpL6IX/nJpOt&#xA;jlfRoKVw2YBEodvda+9P6S54GlGFazyHhwJ11F5YCNnWW1bKoQrqJU6ofgmyxMM=&#xA;=QWra&#xA;-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; BIP 100 initial public draft:&#xA;&gt; https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Emphasis on &#34;initial&#34;  This is a starting point for the usual open source&#xA;&gt; feedback/iteration cycle, not an endpoint that Must Be This Way.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; bitcoin-dev mailing list&#xA;&gt; bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&#xA;&gt; https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a&#xA;techie?&#xA;I own Litmocracy &lt;http://www.litmocracy.com&gt; and Meme Racing&#xA;&lt;http://www.memeracing.net&gt; (in alpha).&#xA;I&#39;m the webmaster for The Voluntaryist &lt;http://www.voluntaryist.com&gt; which&#xA;now accepts Bitcoin.&#xA;I also code for The Dollar Vigilante &lt;http://dollarvigilante.com/&gt;.&#xA;&#34;He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules&#34; - Satoshi&#xA;Nakamoto&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150902/f858063b/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>