rich1.0npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21 📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:01:06AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I don't see any link to data backing up "Bloom filter usage has declined > significantly" > > Is there actual data showing this feature's use is declining or > non-existent? I run a number of high speed nodes and while I don't have historical logs handy over time, I've noticed a drop from about %5-%10 SPV clients at any one time to closer to %1 (Matt: you have a few TB of logs saved don't you?) Also, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as Mycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV verification of block headers w/ lookup servers. Anyway, look at the analogous implementation of NODE_GETUTXO's, which helpfully has provided the infrastructure for wallets that need bloom filters to find appropriate nodes to connect too - we certainely aren't seeing any shortages of nodes for those wallets to use. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 650 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/d339991b/attachment-0001.sig>