rich1.0npub14jv7tj33yt72yk8mljmvkck3p4xm5s3mxfpj289up38qqsn9dhkqeh00t4https://nostr.ae/npub14jv7tj33yt72yk8mljmvkck3p4xm5s3mxfpj289up38qqsn9dhkqeh00t4njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-05-21 📝 Original message:okay, I've set it up with bind forwarding requests to two dnsseeds running on separate ports. Though I see a problem with testnet DNS seed itself. It runs, but somehow it only returns one IP address. Exactly same DNS seeder looking for mainnet nodes is working fine. You can reach seeds through mainnet seed: dig @node.alexykot.me bitcoin-seed.alexykot.me A or directly dig -p 8353 @node.alexykot.me bitcoin-seed.alexykot.me A testnet seed dig @node.alexykot.me testnet-seed.alexykot.me A or directly dig -p 18353 @node.alexykot.me testnet-seed.alexykot.me A So what can be the problem with testnet DNS seeder? Best regards, Alex Kotenko 2014-05-20 1:50 GMT+01:00 Robert McKay <robert at mckay.com>: > On Tue, 20 May 2014 01:44:29 +0100, Robert McKay wrote: > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:49:52 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Robert McKay <robert at mckay.com> > >> wrote: > >>> It should be possible to configure bind as a DNS forwarder.. this > >>> can > >>> be done in a zone context.. then you can forward the different > >>> zones > >>> to > >>> different dnsseed daemons running on different non-public IPs or > >>> two > >>> different ports on the same IP (or on one single non-public IP > >>> since > >>> there's really no reason to expose the dnsseed directly daemon at > >>> all). > >> > >> Quite the opposite. dnsseed data rotates through a lot of addresses > >> if available. Using the bind/zone-xfer system would result in fewer > >> total addresses going through to the clients, thanks to the addition > >> of caching levels that the bind/zone-xfer system brings. > >> > >> That said, if the choice is between no-service and bind, bind it is > >> ;p > > > > Setting it up as a zone forwarder causes each request to go through > > to > > the dnsseed backend for each request. > > This stackoverflow describes a similar situation; > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15338232/how-to-forward-a-subzone > > you can additionally specify the port to forward too; > > http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/queries.html#forwarders > > it should be possible to forward to different ports on 127.0.0.1 for > each dnsseed instance. > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. > Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform > available > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140521/e7433ef3/attachment.html>