<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wt</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wt</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;None of this is a reason why the size can&#39;t increase. However, in my &#xA;opinion, we should do it because we believe it increases utility and &#xA;understand the risks; not because we&#39;re afraid of what might happen if &#xA;we don&#39;t hurry up. And from that point of view, it seems silly to make a &#xA;huge increase at once...&#xA;&#xA;Yes.  I think people/businesses want some kind of assurance that there &#xA;is a path to get things done when needed rather than immediate changes.  &#xA;Since there is currently no clear path/schedule to get any changes &#xA;accomplished they gets anxious.&#xA;&#xA;Russ</html></oembed>