rich1.0npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2phttps://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2pnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-04-05 📝 Original message:On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Matt Whitlock <bip at mattwhitlock.name>wrote: > On Saturday, 5 April 2014, at 12:21 pm, Jorge Timón wrote: > > I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY and > YYYY-DD-MM. > > Your preferences reflect a cultural bias. The only entirely numeric date > format that is unambiguous across all cultures is YYYY-MM-DD. (No culture > uses YYYY-DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems to think so.) > Let's not waste any time shed-painting this. I'd like to finish this discussion at once: https://xkcd.com/1179/ Wladimir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140405/f40e3dcb/attachment.html>