<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0u</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-02-12&#xA;📝 Original message:On 02/12/2014 08:44 AM, Alan Reiner wrote:&#xA;&gt; Changing the protocol to use these static IDs is a pretty fundamental&#xA;&gt; change that would never happen in Bitcoin.   But they can still be&#xA;&gt; useful at the application level to mitigate these issues.&#xA;&#xA;Not to mention that it would be potentially very insecure to have&#xA;consensus depend on data (scriptSigs) which are not hashed in the Merkle&#xA;structure of a block.&#xA;&#xA;Not that anyone on this list has suggested such a change, but I&#39;ve seen&#xA;it raised multiple times on the forum....&#xA;&#xA;Mark</html></oembed>