<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-29&#xA;📝 Original message:I do think we need to move beyond this idea of Bitcoin being some kind of&#xA;elegant embodiment of natural mathematical law. It just ain&#39;t so.&#xA;&#xA;Every time miners and nodes ignore a block that creates &gt;formula() coins&#xA;that&#39;s a majority vote on a controversial political matter, as evidenced by&#xA;the disagreement with mainstream economics and that it&#39;s one of the most&#xA;common things for alt coins to change. Indeed Satoshi&#39;s chosen inflation&#xA;formula is a highly political statement on the value of inflation - he&#xA;could have programmed Bitcoin to inflate forever and avoided a whole area&#xA;of politics, but he chose not to.&#xA;&#xA;So please, let&#39;s agree to accept that Bitcoin is ultimately just a piece of&#xA;software that encodes rules helping us run our little community in some&#xA;specific ways. It&#39;s not physics and we should believe our own hype by&#xA;pretending it is.&#xA;&#xA;On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Adam Back &lt;adam at cypherspace.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; I think the reason that it would likely work out badly is that its not&#xA;&gt; provable, and so no consensus rule can be constructed requiring proof, so&#xA;&gt; then it risks devolving to a political decision.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;It&#39;s the other way around. If miners decide to fork the chain then that&#xA;leaves no proof (beyond the old blocks, which could have been a natural&#xA;fork - there&#39;s no way to know - and nodes don&#39;t want to keep them around&#xA;anyway). If they explicitly vote to get the same effect but without&#xA;actually forking, it leaves a proof in the form of the votes in the&#xA;coinbase that can be seen afterwards.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&gt; Step 3: Finney attackers vote down other pools to make the point.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;It only works if the majority of hashpower is controlled by attackers, in&#xA;which case Bitcoin is already doomed. So it doesn&#39;t matter at that point.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140429/d34bb0b1/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>