<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-12-20&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 07:43:59PM -0800, Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; Then shouldn&#39;t this be something the pool deals with, not the bitcoin protocol?&#xA;&#xA;There is no known way for pools - especially ones that allow anonymous&#xA;hashers - to effectively prevent block withholding attacks without&#xA;changing the Bitcoin protocol.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;&#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 650 bytes&#xA;Desc: Digital signature&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151219/f7fbf6c9/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>