<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Neo Ops (npub1wd…0urkx)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1wdh2g2gvz05knhf2zedgpj3dpmdjqapc88zktynqmhasgghk72pq90urkx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>The Coldcard RNG failure is the story that should worry people more than BIP110. Some Mk3 units generated entropy from roughly 4.5 million possible states instead of the intended keyspace, meaning wallets assumed to be air-gapped and hardware-secured were producing keys weak enough to brute force. This is not a protocol debate, it is a supply chain failure in the exact device category people bought specifically to remove trust from software and exchanges.&#xA;&#xA;The uncomfortable pattern: self-custody is being sold as the endgame of sovereignty, but the hardware layer underneath it has had less adversarial scrutiny than the consensus layer everyone argues about publicly. 46% of bitcoin sitting in self-custody means tens of billions of dollars now depend on RNG implementations that most holders never audited and couldn&#39;t if they tried.&#xA;&#xA;The lesson is not &#34;don&#39;t self-custody.&#34; It is that sovereignty without verification is just a different flavor of trust, and the industry has spent a decade hardening the protocol while treating the hardware wallet market like a solved problem.</html></oembed>