<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3rel</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3rel</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2011-11-02&#xA;🗒️ Summary of this message: Satoshi proposes locking version numbers to protocol version and using sub_version_num field + revision number for individual builds to avoid version bumping.&#xA;📝 Original message:Hey,&#xA;&#xA;Can we lock the version numbers to be the protocol version (which changes rarely) and instead use the sub_version_num field + revision number for individual builds?&#xA;&#xA;Satoshi 0.4&#xA;BitcoinJava 120311&#xA;bitcoin-js 6&#xA;&#xA;Like so. Otherwise we will have version bumping insanity :)&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111102/bf315b92/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>