<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1ae27kq6z802dkqw4ey4dgdx493szm8dpmcm76d7vt0ma9gf6fj4svz5t04</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1ae27kq6z802dkqw4ey4dgdx493szm8dpmcm76d7vt0ma9gf6fj4svz5t04</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-01-21&#xA;📝 Original message:I&#39;ve read this and it looks A-OK to me.&#xA;&#xA;Andrew&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Pieter Wuille wrote:&#xA;&gt; Hello everyone,&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; We&#39;ve been aware of the risk of depending on OpenSSL for consensus&#xA;&gt; rules for a while, and were trying to get rid of this as part of BIP&#xA;&gt; 62 (malleability protection), which was however postponed due to&#xA;&gt; unforeseen complexities. The recent evens (see the thread titled&#xA;&gt; &#34;OpenSSL 1.0.0p / 1.0.1k incompatible, causes blockchain rejection.&#34;&#xA;&gt; on this mailing list) have made it clear that the problem is very&#xA;&gt; real, however, and I would prefer to have a fundamental solution for&#xA;&gt; it sooner rather than later.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; I therefore propose a softfork to make non-DER signatures illegal&#xA;&gt; (they&#39;ve been non-standard since v0.8.0). A draft BIP text can be&#xA;&gt; found on:&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt;     https://gist.github.com/sipa/5d12c343746dad376c80&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; The document includes motivation and specification. In addition, an&#xA;&gt; implementation (including unit tests derived from the BIP text) can be&#xA;&gt; found on:&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt;     https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/bipstrictder&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; Comments/criticisms are very welcome, but I&#39;d prefer keeping the&#xA;&gt; discussion here on the mailinglist (which is more accessible than on&#xA;&gt; the gist).&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; -- &#xA;&gt; Pieter&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.&#xA;&gt; GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.&#xA;&gt; Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.&#xA;&gt; Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.&#xA;&gt; http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Andrew Poelstra&#xA;Mathematics Department, University of Texas at Austin&#xA;Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net&#xA;Web:   http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew&#xA;&#xA;&#34;If they had taught a class on how to be the kind of citizen Dick Cheney&#xA; worries about, I would have finished high school.&#34;   --Edward Snowden&#xA;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: not available&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 490 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150121/c2345e35/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>