rich1.0npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0https://nostr.ae/npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2022-06-12 📝 Original message:Yes Although I'm guessing most would agree that would be worse. I certainly would choose to add fee generating features over inflation Probably most other people would too On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 11:36 PM Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > Maintaining the security of the protocol is squarely the responsibility > of > > the Bitcoin software and the core developers > > > > Continued demand for block space is critical for Bitcoin's security. > > Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue > indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block > space > would not be critical to Bitcoin's security. > > -- > https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220612/b66df85b/attachment.html>