<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpg</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-06-24&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Jeff Garzik &lt;jgarzik at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; There is no voting in the way you think. Devs commit changes the users&#xA;&gt; will accept and use. Users &#34;fire&#34; developers by choosing different devs or&#xA;&gt; different software.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I think that statement is too weak. Users are all personally responsible&#xA;for evaluating all rules for themselves. Many have chosen and will continue&#xA;to choose to just keep an ear out for rule changes that they may be&#xA;interested in using. Ever user should be educated on this topic...&#xA;otherwise there are too many principal agent problems, even with the&#xA;ability to &#34;fire&#34; developers (a.k.a &#34;use different software&#34;). It&#39;s similar&#xA;to the reasons why it&#39;s important to see all the transactions on the&#xA;network.&#xA;&#xA;- Bryan&#xA;http://heybryan.org/&#xA;1 512 203 0507&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150624/92da5acc/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>