<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub130jddflllc905dlmj0pks9j6fdtld9eu0pql9gm86dxts7whrvxq5hyp4t</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub130jddflllc905dlmj0pks9j6fdtld9eu0pql9gm86dxts7whrvxq5hyp4t</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-06-21&#xA;📝 Original message:On 06/19/2015 07:48 AM, Brooks Boyd wrote:&#xA;&gt; Has there been any talk about reducing the time between blocks? If&#xA;&gt; blocks were allowed to come twice as fast, they would be able to clear&#xA;&gt; pending transactions in the mempool the same as if the block size&#xA;&gt; doubled, but would allow mining to stay more decentralized since miners&#xA;&gt; wouldn&#39;t be working on such large-scale blocks? It would still take more&#xA;&gt; storage space to store the blockchain, though.&#xA;&#xA;https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg07663.html</html></oembed>