rich1.0npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwethttps://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-05-21 📝 Original message:On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Friedenbach <mark at monetize.io> wrote: > Honest question: what would signed commits do to help us here anyway? > What's the problem being solved? > > Unfortunately git places signatures in the history itself, so it's not > like we could use easily use signatures to indicate acceptance after > code review, like we could if we were using monotone for example. Git > just wasn't designed for a commit-signing workflow. Just makes it easier to sort out things like your git account (or the git site) being compromised and used to submit commits.