rich1.0npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3lhttps://nostr.ae/npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3lnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2018-05-14 📝 Original message:Good morning Luke, > (Maybe it should be the first output > > instead of the last... Is there any legitimate reason one would have multiple > > such dummy outputs?) None, but how about use of `SIGHASH_SINGLE` flag? If a dummy output is added as the first, would it not require adjustment of the inputs of the transaction? In context you are discussing the transaction serialization, though, so perhaps `SIGHASH_SINGLE`, is unaffected? Regards, ZmnSCPxj