rich1.0npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2phttps://nostr.ae/npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2pnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-04-09 📝 Original message:On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:12 PM, slush <slush at centrum.cz> wrote: > Maybe there're other ideas how to improve current situation without needs > of reworking the architecture. > Nothing I've proposed here would require larger changes to the architecture then were already planned. After SPV lands we are going to split off the wallet, and that will need an interface to an bitcoind to allow 'running with full node'. If that can be generalized to be useful for other (SPV) clients as well, that would be useful, hence I asked for input. It of course doesn't preclude also looking for other solutions. Wladimir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140409/eb8737dd/attachment.html>