<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6r</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2016-06-23&#xA;📝 Original message:On Jun 23, 2016 12:56, &#34;Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev&#34; &lt;&#xA;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; In any case, I&#39;d strongly argue that we remove BIP75 from the bips&#xA;repository,&#xA;&gt; and boycott wallets that implement it. It&#39;s bad strategy for Bitcoin&#xA;developers&#xA;&gt; to willingly participate in AML/KYC, just the same way as it&#39;s bad for&#xA;Tor to&#xA;&gt; add wiretapping functionality, and W3C to support DRM tech. The minor&#xA;tactical&#xA;&gt; wins you&#39;ll get our of this aren&#39;t worth it.&#xA;&#xA;I hope you&#39;re not seriously suggesting to censor a BIP because you feel it&#xA;is a bad idea.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Pieter&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160623/b6c34061/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>