rich1.0npub1wz8zfl8azn6qfnx5t5d479wwnf69keeq4amvsp590nvzrunqumrqurnuayhttps://nostr.ae/npub1wz8zfl8azn6qfnx5t5d479wwnf69keeq4amvsp590nvzrunqumrqurnuaynjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27 📝 Original message:I wish you were just as prudent when you were recommending full RBF to mining pools. On 6/27/15 11:21 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics. -- Randi Joseph -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/264e693e/attachment.html>