<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1swfeusu3ua9trup00qcnrgc2yndksyvgku4epk5tec7u4fmrez6qxpul5t</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1swfeusu3ua9trup00qcnrgc2yndksyvgku4epk5tec7u4fmrez6qxpul5t</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt; Yes, like any P2P network Bitcoin cannot work if a sufficiently large&#xA;&gt; number of miners decide to attack it.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;1. They won&#39;t be attacking Bitcoin, they will attack merchants who accept&#xA;payments with 0 confirmations. This attack has nothing to do with Bitcoin&#xA;consensus mechanism (as Bitcoin protocol doesn&#39;t provide a consensus over&#xA;mempool contents), thus it is not an attack on Bitcoin.&#xA;2. In the example I used, having 10% of hashpower is enough to offer 10%&#xA;success rate. Would you mind having 1 out of 10 hamburgers for free? If a&#xA;system can be attacked by a tiny fraction, it is a shitty system.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/a6b9081f/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>