<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>CitizenPedro (npub1v2…cetnt)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1v2n2g830p7pzgkrzzk7wyxudfvw87svxyt3dgahrj7xa4vf2edpsscetnt</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Yeah, my personal conclusion is it just doesn&#39;t matter. The uncensorability or further complexity of the network is inevitable at any and all levels. Or said in simpler terms, in a way, the integration of the network into society is the uncensorability. &#xA;&#xA;Some people will be puritan, they&#39;ll maintain a certain variation of the network, but they&#39;ll be connected to everyone else through Nostr, etc, etc.&#xA;&#xA;Teilhard de Chardin has this theory and concept called Omega Point, the theory is that we&#39;re heading for a complexification of society/humanity/individuals/tools/thoughts, etc, etc that will eventually lead to a higher consciousness (i.e a good thing, a better state). It looks spiritual but it has a lot of basis in physics. Plenty of people have written about this, in several fields of science. We are proof of the complexification of the universe.&#xA;&#xA;So all in all, I think the network is pretty much unstoppable at this point.&#xA;&#xA;Because it&#39;s not just Bitcoin, it&#39;s Bitcoin + Nostr + AI + people + everything else that is happening, like regional depopulation, which open more and more opportunities for new economic connections (circular economies), etc.&#xA;&#xA;But these individual positions, groups, are fundamental, because the network can&#39;t ever be group think. On the contrary, and going back to Teilhard&#39;s perspective, the more we approach the complexification/connection with the whole, the more our individuality comes about.&#xA;&#xA;Anyways, it&#39;s hard to express, but I&#39;m personally less worried about these details than a few months ago.</html></oembed>