<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Will Clark [ARCHIVE] (npub12n…x835c)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub12nc7sue8vluy3k0pp3njlmrt5hkrv292n3es07dfqqv6zca3mm5qwx835c</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2020-05-08&#xA;📝 Original message:Hello list,&#xA;&#xA;I would like to propose a compressed block header scheme for IBD and block announcements. This proposal is derivative of previous proposals found on this list (see links in spec below) with some modifications and clarifications.&#xA;&#xA;The below specification (also found at https://github.com/willcl-ark/compressed-block-headers/blob/v1.0/compressed-block-headers.adoc ) details the compression recommended along with the generated bandwidth savings in the best-case scenario.&#xA;&#xA;I look forward to any feedback anyone has to offer on the specification itself, as well as any additions or objections to the motivation.&#xA;&#xA;Cheers,&#xA;Will&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;= Compressed block headers&#xA;Will Clark &lt;will8clark at gmail.com&gt;&#xA;v1.0, May 2020:&#xA;:toc: preamble&#xA;:toclevels: 4&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;This work is a derivation of these mailing list posts:&#xA;&#xA;1. https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-August/014876.html[bitcoin-dev: &#34;Compressed&#34; headers stream - 2017] (with resurrection https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-December/015385.html[here])&#xA;&#xA;2. https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-March/015851.html[bitcoin-dev: Optimized Header Sync]&#xA;&#xA;&#39;&#39;&#39;&#xA;&#xA;== Motivation&#xA;&#xA;Block headers as exchanged by nodes over the p2p network are currently 81 bytes each.&#xA;&#xA;For low bandwidth nodes who are doing a headers-only sync, reducing the size of the headers can provide a significant bandwidth saving. Also, nodes can support more header-only peers for IBD and protection against eclipse attacks if header bandwidth is reduced.&#xA;&#xA;=== Background&#xA;&#xA;Currently headers are sent over the p2p network as a vector of `block_headers`, which are composed of the following sized fields:&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&lt;,&gt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Field               |Size&#xA;&#xA;|Version             |4 bytes&#xA;|Previous block hash |32 bytes&#xA;|Merkle root hash    |32 bytes&#xA;|Time                |4 bytes&#xA;|nBits               |4 bytes&#xA;|nonce               |4 bytes&#xA;|txn_count           |1 byte&#xA;|*Total*             |81 bytes&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;Some fields can be removed completely, others can be compressed under certain conditions.&#xA;&#xA;== Proposed specification&#xA;&#xA;=== block_header2 data type&#xA;&#xA;The following table illustrates the proposed `block_header2` data type specification.&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&lt;,&gt;,&gt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Field               |Size     |Compressed&#xA;&#xA;|Bitfield            |1 byte   | 1 byte&#xA;|Version             |4 bytes  |0 \| 4 bytes&#xA;|Previous block hash |32 bytes |0 \| 32 bytes&#xA;|Merkle root hash    |32 bytes |32 bytes&#xA;|Time                |4 bytes  |2 \| 4 bytes&#xA;|nBits               |4 bytes  |0 \| 4 bytes&#xA;|nonce               |4 bytes  |4 bytes&#xA;|*Total*             |81 bytes |range: 39 - 81 bytes&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;This compression results in a maximum reduction from an 81 byte header to best-case 39 byte header. With 629,474 blocks in the current blockchain, a continuous header sync from genesis (requiring a single full 81 byte header followed by only compressed `block_header2`) has been tested to have its required bandwidth reduced from 50.98MB down to 25.86MB, a saving of 49%.&#xA;&#xA;==== Bitfield&#xA;&#xA;To make parsing of header messages easier and further increase header compression, a single byte bitfield was suggested by gmaxwell footnote:[https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-December/015397.html]. We propose the following amended bitfield meanings (bits re-ordered to match `headers2` field order):&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&lt;,&lt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Bit |Meaning + field size to read&#xA;&#xA;|0 +&#xA;1 +&#xA;2    |version: same as the last *distinct* value 1st ... 7th (0 byte field) or a new 32bit distinct value (4 byte field).&#xA;|3   |prev_block_hash: is omitted (0 byte field) or included (32 byte field)&#xA;|4   |timestamp: as small offset (2 byte field) or full (4 byte field).&#xA;|5   |nbits: same as last header (0 byte field) or new (4 byte field).&#xA;|6   |possibly to signal &#34;more headers follow&#34; to make the encoding self-delimiting.&#xA;|7   |currently undefined&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;This bitfield adds 1 byte for every block in the chain, for a current total increase of 629,474B.&#xA;&#xA;==== Version&#xA;&#xA;In most cases the Version field will be identical to one referenced in one of the previous 7 unique versions, as indicated by bits 0,1,2 of the Bitfield.&#xA;&#xA;To block 629,474 there were 616,137 blocks whose version was in the previous 7 distinct versions, and only 13,338 blocks whose version was not, this includes any version bit manipulation done via overt ASIC boost.&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&gt;,&gt;,&gt;,&gt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Genesis to block |Current (B) |Compressed (B) |Saving (%)&#xA;&#xA;|629,474          |2,517,896   |53,352         |98&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;==== Previous block hash&#xA;&#xA;The previous block hash will always be the&#xA;`SHA256(SHA256(&lt;previous_header&gt;))` so is redundant, presuming you have the previous header in the chain.&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&gt;,&gt;,&gt;,&gt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Genesis to block |Current (B) |Compressed (B) |Saving (%)&#xA;&#xA;|629,474          |20,143,168  |0              |100&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;==== Time&#xA;&#xA;The timestamp (in seconds) is consensus bound, based both on the time in the previous&#xA;header: `MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME = 2 * 60 * 60 = 7200`, and being greater than the `MedianTimePast` of the previous 11 blocks. Therefore this can be safely represented as an offset from the previous headers&#39; timestamp using a 2 byte `signed short int`.&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&gt;,&gt;,&gt;,&gt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Genesis to block |Current (B) |Compressed (B) |Saving (%)&#xA;&#xA;|629,474          |2,517,896   |1,258,952      |50&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;==== nBits&#xA;&#xA;nBits currently changes once every 2016 blocks. It could be entirely calculated by the client from the timestamps of the previous 2015 blocks footnote:[2015 blocks are used in the adjustment calculation due to an off-by-one error: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43692.msg521772#msg521772&#34;].&#xA;&#xA;To simplify &#39;light&#39; client implementations which would otherwise require consensus-valid calculation of the adjustments, we propose to transmit this according to the &lt;&lt;Bitfield&gt;&gt; specification above.&#xA;&#xA;To block 629,474 there have been 298 nBits adjustments (vs an expected 311 -- there was none before block 32,256).&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&gt;,&gt;,&gt;,&gt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Genesis to block |Current (B) |Compressed (B) |Saving (%)&#xA;&#xA;|629,474          |2,517,896   |1,196          |99.6&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;==== txn_count&#xA;&#xA;txn_count is included to make parsing of these messages compatible with parsing of `block` messages footnote:[https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2104/why-is-the-block-header-txn-count-field-always-zero]. Therefore this field and its associated byte can be removed for transmission of compact headers.&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&gt;,&gt;,&gt;,&gt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Genesis to block |Current (B) |Compressed (B) |Saving (%)&#xA;&#xA;|629,474          |629,474     |0              |100&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;=== Service Bit&#xA;&#xA;A new service bit would be required so that the nodes can advertise their ability to supply compact headers.&#xA;&#xA;=== P2P Messages&#xA;&#xA;Three new messages would be used by nodes that enable compact block header support, two query messages: `getheaders2` and `sendheaders2` and one response: `headers2`.&#xA;&#xA;==== `getheaders2` -- Requesting compact headers&#xA;&#xA;The new p2p message required to request compact block headers would require the same fields as the current `getheaders` message:&#xA;&#xA;[cols=&#34;&gt;,&lt;,&lt;,&lt;&#34;]&#xA;|===&#xA;|Field Size |Description          |Data type |Comments&#xA;&#xA;|4          |version              |uint32_t  |the protocol version&#xA;|1+         |hash count           |var_int   |number of block locator hash entries&#xA;|32+        |block locator hashes |char[32]  |block locator object; newest back to genesis block (dense to start, but then sparse)&#xA;|32         |hash_stop            |char[32]  |hash of the last desired block header; set to zero to get as many blocks as possible (2000)&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;==== `sendheaders2` -- Request compact header announcements&#xA;&#xA;Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0130.mediawiki[BIP-130], nodes have been able to request to receive new headers directly in `headers` messages, rather than via an `inv` of the new block hash and subsequent `getheader` request and `headers` response (followed by a final `getdata` to get the tip block itself, if desired). This is requested by transmitting an empty `sendheaders` message after the version handshake is complete.]&#xA;&#xA;Upon receipt of this message, the node is permitted, but not required, to preemptively announce new headers with the `headers2` message (instead of `inv`). Preemptive header announcement is supported by the protocol version ≥ 70012 | Bitcoin Core version ≥ 0.12.0.&#xA;&#xA;For the motivational use-case it makes sense to also update this mechanism to support sending header updates using compact headers using a new message.&#xA;&#xA;==== `headers2` -- Receiving compact headers&#xA;&#xA;A `headers2` message is returned in response to `getheaders2` or at new header announcement following a `sendheaders2` request. It contains both `length` and `headers` fields. The `headers` field contains a variable length vector of `block_header2`:&#xA;&#xA;|===&#xA;|Field Size |Description |Data type       |Comments&#xA;&#xA;|1+         |length      |var_int         |Length of `headers`&#xA;|39-81x?    |headers     |block_header2[] |Compressed block headers in &lt;&lt;block_header2 data type&gt;&gt; format&#xA;|===&#xA;&#xA;=== Implementation&#xA;&#xA;* The first header in the first `block_header2[]` vector to a newly-connected client MUST contain the full nBits`, `timestamp`, `version` and `prev_block_hash` fields, along with a correctly populated `bitfield` byte.&#xA;* Subsequent headers in a contiguous vector SHOULD follow the compressed &lt;&lt;block_header2 data type&gt;&gt; format.&#xA;* Subsequent compressed headers supplied to an already-connected client (requesting compressed headers), SHOULD follow the compressed &lt;&lt;block_header2 data type&gt;&gt; format.</html></oembed>