rich1.0npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21 📝 Original message:On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:38:19PM -0700, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Motivation > > ========== > > > > BIP 37 did not specify a service bit for the bloom filter service, thus > > implicitly assuming that all nodes that serve peers data support it. > > However, the connection filtering algorithm proposed in BIP 37, and > > implemented in several clients today, has been shown to provide little > > to no privacy, as well as being a large DoS risk on some nodes. Thus, > > allowing node operators to disable connection bloom filtering is a > > much-needed feature. > > I'd reference that paper on bloom filters re: the "little to no privacy" > issue. There's also a post in the bitcoinj mailing list somewhere IIRC > talking about the default settings, and how they don't provide any > privacy. Oh, and we should also point out that Bloom filters have scaling issues, as each application of the filter has to scan the whole blockchain - with future blocksize increases these issues increase, in some proposals quite dramatically. The underlying idea also conflicts with some proposals to "shard" the blockchain, again suggesting that we need a bit to handle future upgrades to more scalable designs. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 650 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/17f5c150/attachment-0001.sig>