<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>codonaft (npub1al…7rg94)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1alptdev5srcw2hxg03567p4k6xs3lgj7f6545suc0rzp0xw98svse7rg94</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Wouldn&#39;t it be useful to have a censorship-resistant layer for normie DNS? Controlled from Nostr.&#xA;&#xA;#asknostr #devstr #dns&#xA;&#xA;Without going too much into design details, npubs that used to have their valid NIP-05 `_@domain` could keep controlling their domain records after their domain takedown. Records are resolvable through ordinary nameservers that could be used as an alternative to Quad9/CF/etc., could be run by whoever wants, and could be advertised with DHCP in Nostr-VPN/Obscura/etc. by default.&#xA;&#xA;TLS will possibly keep working normally after a domain takedown until the cert expires. Useful for site redirection when it&#39;s accessed from an ordinary browser.&#xA;&#xA;HTTPS could be allowed with self-signed certs (at least for the taken-down domains) in the native Nostr clients. Relays would just keep working.&#xA;&#xA;All this would to some degree backfire on domain registrars (or whoever is involved) every time they conform to a domain ban requirement: with some limitations, the original authentic domain owners will be awarded a forever free domain when it&#39;s banned. Except these lucky banned domain owners will be actual owners, independent from ICANN.&#xA;</html></oembed>