<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>hodlbod (npub1jl…jynqn)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Thanks. I read through 20 pages or so, and might continue, it&#39;s nice to get the inside perspective at least. I&#39;ve been meaning to read Simón Bolívar for a long time.&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m familiar with this style of feminism. Its sanitized approach is very much a product of its time — the pre-2014 world was much more &#34;liberal&#34; than &#34;progressive&#34;, and hoodwinked lots of well-meaning nice people into adopting the framework that originated the movement.&#xA;&#xA;To bring it up now in 2026 is just gaslighting. Nice liberal feminism sets up a straw man of violence and bigotry in order to knock it down, while appealing to a sense of justice that it can&#39;t sustain. Feminism is a friendly face of marxism, which is an acid that destroys any institution it touches.&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t deny the existence of injustice, even &#34;systemic&#34;. But I also affirm the goodness of gender roles, the family, and many other &#34;structures of power&#34; that feminism is inherently hostile to (however much it might try to wear them as a skin suit).</html></oembed>