<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>zaytun (npub1wn…845pr)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1wnw8s4eq2uwkhdvyue72m0w5u3zfhywuuk4nrunxeg3wac958n9st845pr</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>Again, thanks for adding nuance. &#xA;&#xA;I think your own wording is victim of your own bias, respectfully. &#xA;&#xA;&#34;Any group deciding&#34;. &#xA;&#xA;Whatever technically goes in AND &#xA;Whatever the protocol signals should go in&#xA;&#xA;Is arguably the common directive of bitcoiners as a community, you included. &#xA;&#xA;So if BIP110 is the signal, its also your signal&#xA;&#xA;If 100kb  is the signal, its also your signal&#xA;&#xA;I agree completely, no group should decide. But thats the idea behind general consensus, both protocol consensus and social consensus.&#xA;&#xA;You, individually, choose to run core v19, so you are technically signalling some form of opinion. &#xA;&#xA;You also would recommend people run v30 (in due time, when v32 released)&#xA;&#xA;Are you comfortable recommending the average pleb to run software you think includes misguided changes?</html></oembed>