rich1.0npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-05-22 📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I've got a PGP smart card reader and card with a securely generated key and pin entered per signature. Re: multisig, that's precisely why we want more than just a single maintainer signing commits. PGP isn't perfect, but perfect is the enemy of good. On 22 May 2014 21:06:10 GMT+03:00, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote: >Related: Current multi-sig wallet technology being rolled out now, >with 2FA and other fancy doodads, is now arguably more secure than my >PGP keyring. My PGP keyring is, to draw an analogy, a non-multisig >wallet (set of keys), with all the associated theft/data >destruction/backup risks. > >The more improvements I see in bitcoin wallets, the more antiquated my >PGP keyring appears. Zero concept of multisig. The PGP keyring >compromise process is rarely exercised. 2FA is lacking. At least >offline signing works well. Mostly. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.1.1 iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJTfpWNMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8 cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhfVGB/448B6UvhN7bmFQxmLS 9+wlhWGYioJKUPspz2Wtk0p8v1y1XlDt0UxC+5ODin4a/Zk0+0x4G4MWyaUP1TnA Wq9FquY3MwTXDrwWzmeQR4QcRbC+EMMk6kXswzT4d/2clUwB1pLl2MYGnS9DjUK2 of0kzZEbaQvxSKcFmvuqhz0QqGy84pkHAFBHfopS1j4WqIZpelUMzBGRYP8D1IQd H/M2YxdQ7T8peiNigqWSyllchKqGoLG+KEr3mvTYRLkxoYw5XTcFyc5AmuTRfzEC yhRc7CJwTZjHYahgZRPGJQM0qeopdIVAifCu9NoPgdkyuQL+X8XSidrU5Kbv/YeZ Scv/ =GdA4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----