rich1.0npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wthttps://nostr.ae/npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wtnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26 📝 Original message:> Proposing inaction is not the way you convince people that bitcoin can > scale. > > People and businesses cannot perform any capacity planning and future > projections under the proposal of "economic change through inaction." > > There will be no growth, by your argument, until there is fee > pressure. And what happens then? It is not clear he is proposing "inaction." I am not sure what he is proposing other than being against knee-jerk reactions. He has also said he doesn't want to take on the responsibility of deciding on whether to approve hard fork changes which is understandable considering all the other things he is doing. Such a responsibility is probably too much of a burden to put on any one individual no matter who it is. The next step is to come up with a process to handle proposed hard-fork changes other than just to ask the Core maintainer to do it. Russ