<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-14&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Jorge Timón &lt;jtimon at jtimon.cc&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Venzen Khaosan &lt;venzen at mail.bihthai.net&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; 4) General, undefined fear that something bad is going to happen when&#xA;&gt;&gt; nodes choke up on a backlog of transactions.&#xA;&gt;&gt; - - no specific symptoms are pointed at but presumably there is&#xA;&gt;&gt; &#34;pre-traumatic stress&#34; at play.&#xA;&gt;&gt; - - Bitcoin-based businesses are going to lose money, customers and&#xA;&gt;&gt; potentially fail&#xA;&gt;&gt; - - people will flee Bitcoin for another cryptocoin and Bitcoin will be&#xA;&gt;&gt; left in the corner, collecting dust and memories of it will fade as&#xA;&gt;&gt; SuperCoin with its big blocks becomes all things to all people.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I believe thisbelongs in 2, not really sure if 2.1 or 2.2 since it&#39;s&#xA;&gt; related to both.&#xA;&#xA;I was tempted to add it as a sub-sub-risk in both, since both things&#xA;need to be solved before that stop being a concern. But they may be&#xA;more things to do to solve that so I&#39;m listing it as a separate&#xA;sub-risk in 2:&#xA;&#xA;2.3) Big list of valid unconfirmed transactions&#xA;&#xA;resulting list:&#xA;&#xA;1) Potential indirect consequence of rising fees.&#xA;&#xA;1.1) Lowest fee transactions (currently free transactions) will become&#xA;more unreliable.&#xA;1.2) People will migrate to competing systems (PoW altcoins) with lower fees.&#xA;1.3) Layer 2 settlements become more expensive&#xA;1.4) Less usage than we could have had with a bigger size&#xA;1.4.1) More regulation pressure&#xA;1.4.2) Not enough fees when subsidy is lower&#xA;&#xA;2) Software problem independent of a concrete block size that needs to&#xA;be solved anyway, often specific to Bitcoin Core (ie other&#xA;implementations, say libbitcoin may not necessarily share these&#xA;problems).&#xA;&#xA;2.1) Bitcoin Core&#39;s mempool is unbounded in size and can make the program&#xA;crash by using too much memory.&#xA;&#xA;2.2) There&#39;s no good way to increase the fee of a transaction that is&#xA;taking too long to be mined without the &#34;double spending&#34; transaction&#xA;with the higher fee being blocked by most nodes which follow Bitcoin&#xA;Core&#39;s default policy for conflicting spends replacements (aka &#34;first&#xA;seen&#34; replacement policy).&#xA;&#xA;2.3) Big list of valid unconfirmed transactions</html></oembed>