<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-07-07&#xA;📝 Original message:On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev&#xA;&lt;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; Larger block sizes is not likely to have a meaningful impact on fee pressure.&#xA;&gt; Any expectations that do not match the reality are merely misguided, and&#xA;&gt; should not be a basis for changing Bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;I think it&#39;s very clear that they will in the very short term&#xA;(https://anduck.net/bitcoin/fees/4320_blocks.php  note the rate drops&#xA;when demand falls below supply). But I agree with you if you mean a&#xA;somewhat longer term e.g. a year out.</html></oembed>