rich1.0npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95jhttps://nostr.ae/npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95jnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13 📝 Original message:rOn Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:57:33PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > > > > On further reflection, I'm not sure I understand this use case of the > > payment protocol. Since a PaymentRequest currently contains the > > Outputs that specify the addresses to send to, reusing a > > PaymentRequest like this without using stealth addresses implies > > address reuse. > > > Yes indeed ...... which is why we're talking about extending the protocol > (in a future version! the first version isn't even out yet!). Yes, sorry, I miscontrued the thread here and now see that your message was exactly talking about using stealth addresses within the payment protocol. Sorry for the confusion. roy